{"id":346,"date":"2016-09-24T22:01:10","date_gmt":"2016-09-24T22:01:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/192.249.112.188\/~goldstein\/?page_id=346"},"modified":"2016-09-24T22:01:10","modified_gmt":"2016-09-24T22:01:10","slug":"published-works","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/jaglaw.net\/published-works\/","title":{"rendered":"Published Works"},"content":{"rendered":"
All articles on this page are in Adobe pdf format. Download the free reader\u00a0here.<\/a><\/p>\n Merriman v. Cokeley, 168 Wash.2d 627, 230 P.3d 162 (2010). Survey markers insufficient to establish well-defined boundary under doctrine of mutual recognition and acquiescence.<\/p>\n Dickgieser v. State, 153 Wash.2d 530, 105 P.3d 26 (2005). Damage to private property that was reasonably necessary to log state lands was for a public use, requiring compensation.<\/p>\n Renfro v Kaur, 156 Wash.App 1005 (2010). Disclosure statement required and not waived in real estate purchase and sale agreement<\/p>\n Friend v. Friend, 92 Wash.App. 799, 964 P .2d 1219, rev. denied 137 Wash.2d 1030, 980 P .2d 1283 (1999). Partition by sale of tenancy in common, not partition in kind, was appropriate remedy where, if properties were divided in kind, result would be nonconforming lots that violated county\u2019s zoning requirements, causing great prejudice to the owners.<\/p>\n Genotti v. Mason County, SHB No. 99-011 (1999). Proposed dock not consistent with Shoreline Management Act and Shoreline Master Program.<\/p>\n Viafore v. Mason County, SHB No. 99-033 (2000). Proposed dock not consistent with Shoreline Management Act and Shoreline Master Program.<\/p>\n Structural Investments & Planning IV, LLC v. Schiller, 147 Wash.App. 1040 (2008). Construes timber trespass statutes RCW 4.24.630 and 64.12.030<\/p>\n Ervin v. Muller, 117 Wash.App 1085 (2003). Compound interest appropriate; for interest rate to be usurious, it must be so at the inception of the contract; truth in lending act does not apply.<\/p>\n “Appropriate Termination Practices”<\/a><\/p>\n “What’s Reasonable About Attorney Fees?”<\/a><\/p>\n “Lien Claims for Public Works Projects”<\/a><\/p>\n “Small Claims Court”<\/a><\/p>\n “Slap Suits”<\/a><\/p>\n Potential Problems for Developers and Sellers (Caselaw Update)<\/a><\/p>\n “All About RUPA”<\/a><\/p>\n “Wetland Banking”<\/a><\/p>\n February 22, 1999, “Counting the Days”<\/a> Published Works by Jay A. Goldstein All articles on this page are in Adobe pdf format. Download the free reader\u00a0here. Reported Cases Merriman v. Cokeley, 168 Wash.2d 627, 230 P.3d 162 (2010). Survey markers insufficient to establish well-defined boundary under doctrine of mutual recognition and acquiescence. Dickgieser v. State, 153 Wash.2d 530, 105 P.3d 26…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"yoast_head":"\nReported Cases<\/h2>\n
Unreported Cases<\/h2>\n
Articles<\/h2>\n
Chalkline Articles<\/h2>\n
\nMarch 23, 1999, “Overtime”<\/a>
\nApril 19, 1999, “Contractor Registration Exemptions”<\/a>
\nJune 25, 1999, “Be Workmanlike”<\/a>
\nAugust 23, 1999, “Water Rights and Development Costs”<\/a>
\nJuly 25, 1999, “No Consumer Protection Act Violation for Failure to Disclose”<\/a>
\nMay 26, 1998, “Bits & Pieces”<\/a>
\nJune 19, 1998, “Public Disclosure and Freedom of Information”<\/a>
\nJuly 27, 1998, “All About Access”\u00a0<\/a>
\nSeptember 21, 1998, ” Current Developments in Business Law”<\/a>
\nOctober 26, 1998, “GateKeepers”<\/a>
\nNovember 24, 1998, “Realtor’s Beware”<\/a>
\nMarch 1998, “Washington’s Implied Warranty of Habitability”<\/a>
\nApril 28, 1997, “Illegal Contracts for Land Improvement are Unenforceable”\u00a0<\/a>
\nMay 27, 1997, “New Lender and Fiduciary Protection Aids Brownfield Redevelopment”<\/a>
\nJuly 22, 1997, “Disorder in the Court”<\/a>
\nAugust 25, 1997, “Cobb v. Snohomish County”<\/a>
\nJune 24, 1996 “Caselaw Update of interest to Builders and Developers”<\/a>
\nMarch 20, 1996, “Getting Back to Basics”<\/a>
\nAugust 26, 1996, “Caselaw Update on Brokerage and Consumer Protection Act (CPA)”<\/a>
\nOctober 23, 1996, “Real Estate Agency, Revisited”<\/a>
\nOctober 29, 1995, “Felt v. McCarthy”<\/a>
\nSeptember 1994, “Berschauer v.Tumwater”<\/a>
\nNovember 30, 1994, “Specific Enforcement of Real Estate Agreements”<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"